Instagram/@mngovernor
The governor has put his stake in state politics to guarantee healthcare for Minnesotans at an affordable price, he has even cursed the Washington Republicans for putting their great medical systems in jeopardy. The very diverse reactions to the governor’s statement ranged from calls of ‘Universal Healthcare’ to politically-charged responses to outright spam.
Advertisement
Governor Walz made a robust and very substantial promise to the people of Minnesota this week: “We will do everything we can at the state level” to ensure that healthcare is present for Minnesotans whenever they need it, regardless of the cost. This statement didn’t stray from the abrupt attack on the national Republicans, accusing them of putting the affordability of “some of the best health care systems in the world” into limbo.
The governor was very clear: while Minnesota boasts one of the best medical infrastructures, outside politics has been injecting a measure of dangerous instability within it. His promised intervention at the state level fits a growing trend of states determined to protect their people from federal policy disputes. It cannot be shrugged off as one more exercise in political maneuvering; it is a sincere response to the real intense concern about the rising cost of healthcare weighing heavily against families across this state.
Reaction to the post was immediate and wildly divergent when it comes to style and content. “Let’s have our own universal healthcare where everyone is automatically enrolled and all providers are INN,” said one person. Such commentary shows that the desire of a section of the progressive movement to see a state-based single-payer system still exists-that is, fully out from under the current insurance set. It’s a radical re-imagining of how healthcare delivery and financing structures dominate Minnesota.
An alternative view goes for more pragmatic: “Please extend the premium tax credits!” In essence, the claim is that premium tax credits are the best sort of relief that many individual persons can count on to keep insurance plans within their means in the near term. Currently, however, the future of these subsidies is very hotly debated in Washington and tearing the nerves of those who count on them.
The thread was often interrupted by off-topic inflammatory remarks. One detractor outright blamed the governor: “Then stop letting fraud run rampant through the state system.” Vague though it maybe, it point to some deeper grievances related to government efficacy and spending. Another derided: “Blaming others for your major failures is an old vinyl record skipping. Besides the Twin Shitty’s you have no support.” That raunchy term for the Twin Cities metro area is reflective of the urban-rural political divide underscoring Minnesota politics.
Most bizarre was a user who stepped in: “Governor Walz will there be sufficient funding for transition surgery so they can use tampons correctly?” This, clearly eliciting a sting at transgender healthcare debates, opened the floor for hostile responses. One of the respondents said, “I bet you shove 4 tampons up your ass every morning. Since you are so obsessed with them.” The naive hopes for policy conversations, henceforth, metamorphosed into downright character assassinations.
A good chunk of the comment section was quite possibly already taken over by the spam bot. The very same account and its clones kept dumping an identical block of text about some very bizarre environmental grievances that never had anything to do with healthcare. “Literally animal farms are dumping toxic waste and feces into rivers and waterways, poisoning water and soil,” was copy-pasted ad nauseam, ever muddying the conversation. A user even said, “Ignore the spam bot replying to you, btw.” There was a hope this would bring the conversations back on track.
Then there was this much more sober comment: “I’m just here to watch all the Kool-aid drinking maga cucks prove which one is most poorly educated.” This was basically a meta-condensate about the nature of online political conversations that absolutely set in relief the bitter reality of trying to hold an earnest conversation in such a very polarized environment.
Advertisement
Governor Walz’s crucial point, the safeguarding of the healthcare affordability state that boasts having the likes of Mayo Clinic there among its medical institutions, has been met by a response that has now shown how any arena of any healthcare policy discussion has now become the battleground for broader political fighting, spam, and invective. That promise of the state will now become this great big political fight that will be fought not only in the capitol but also on the fingers of public opinion out in the chaotic wild of the online world.