X/@ACTBrigitte
Brigitte Gabriel, ACT for America founder, stated publicly that Ilhan Omar ought not to be serving in Congress. The conservative activist posted a statement accompanied by the profane image she had opened, sparking vehement reactions on all political spectrums.
Advertisement
Determined in her every movement in national security and anti-extremism circles, she was brutally direct regarding her wishes for Omar. She laid bare the very long-standing criticisms faced by the Democratic Congresswoman from Minnesota. Omar is considered by many public experts to be among the very first Muslim women invited into Congress; she simultaneously has been at the center of truly controversial and constitutionally recognizable political opinions and public statements on foreign policy.
Responses to the post came thick and fast but remained quite polarized. One of the vehement dissidents said, “She should not be in the United States of America.” This says much about this level of contention against Omar: Some people go beyond simply asking her to relinquish her office, even beyond-the legal-norms, saying that she should be expelled from the country itself.
Another commented with resentment over the seeming lack of response: “We all agree but no one does anything about it.” This is a major theme among the critics-their grievances against the political class fall on deaf ears.
Not all were of the same opinion as Gabriel. One asked Gabriel herself, “You are a Zionist immigrant, so respect her.” The response arguably points to an ironic contradiction in the criticism advanced toward the other immigrant congresswoman by highlighting Gabriel’s own background as a Lebanese immigrant and an ardent pro-Israel activist.
The dive into controversy tied itself to a broader citizenship and loyalty question that went beyond Omar’s congressional life. Another comment said: “She is a citizen, and deserves all the rights of citizenship,” hence resisting any further calls to expel Omar.
Some comments appeared to focus on specific allegations, such as, she should be “deported for fraudulently signing off on government documents claiming she’s married to her brother”. Suggestions such as these have been going around in conservative media with absolutely no conclusive evidence.
These extreme responses certainly serve to expose how deeply the divisions go, namely around certain diametrically opposed figures incarnating Congress. Gabriel’s proclamation, although allied with many upon whose ranks she stands, has equally been condemned as the latest escalation by her opponents in the targeting of Muslim-elected officials.
The dispute is about more than political dissent; these are the grounds for ongoing debates about representation, citizenship, and what it means to be qualified to hold office. These ongoing debates do paint a picture, at least for some: awkward conditions, if not downright hostile, under which politicians representing minorities or carrying potentially unpopular views have to maneuver.
Advertisement
This is not going to wind down anytime soon with the acrimony stirred up by this post, energizing both sides of the debate. Still, it remains to be seen whether this row will catalyze any concrete action concerning Omar’s position in the immediate future, but there’s intensity behind the feelings that’ll consigned have this incident to memory. This incident has drawn comparisons to the political strategy of Zohran Mamdani.