Instagram/@cthagod
At last, the boxing fraternity has been divided into two camps. The undefeated WBA lightweight champion will meet famous ex-YouTuber, Jake Paul. Lorosa of The Breakfast Club attacked the announcement, spike-firing the argument of legacy versus payday.
Advertisement
The victory really turns Davis’s career upside down if tentative plans hold for November. Certainly, the disputed deadlock with Lamont Roach Jr. deserved an immediate rematch, but the purists feel this fight with Paul being a way of ducking real competition. The debate on The Breakfast Club nailed it: Is this smart money move, or is it a shame for the sport?
“It’s a very unusual fight. Very unusual,” stated one of the hosts, reflecting the shock felt in the boxing fraternity. They said, in fact, that Davis’s boxing pedigree is far ahead and, in all fairness, is considered the favorite person who can “possibly make Jake Paul look silly in the ring”, but there’s one thing that they truly just cannot accept-the circus aspect of the whole thing. Ryan Garcia’s comments about boxing nowadays being the WWE were echoed by many, condemning the entire spectacle as an obscenity to the sport of boxing.
This is money-wise a behemoth. It was reported that Davis could be making upwards of $40 million. Compared to his other fights, the voice of the fans is split. Many are calling for a boycott with commentaries such as, “Boycott the fight, don’t watch it, don’t pay for it” and “I ain’t watching this ish.” The other side of the fence is, more or less, people saying pragmatic things, trying to convince the fighter to focus on other ways of securing his financial future.
A fan put it nicely: “Tank doesn’t have to fight anyone else if he doesn’t choose to and if his focus is to get the bag and retire that’s cool too, it does nothing to his legacy. It’s also been proven that legacy is all that some of our prior champions have and you can’t survive off of that.” This comment seemed to be well-received, with a follow-up by another user stating that a legacy is all well and good, but in twenty years, it will be the security of Davis’s family that matters more than whatever record he holds in the ring.
Perhaps the boldest critique comes from those who feel Davis is turning away from what he owes as a bona fide champion. “If you really consider yourself the face of boxing, you gotta fight the best! Secondly, Roach earned that rematch, you gotta run that back! If not, just say you’re scared to risk taking an L,” one user stated. This sentiment underscores the idea that world-class fighters ought to pursue the most difficult challenge to prove their greatness and not take the easiest pays.
The counterargument is downright practical, however. “Yall have expectations for people that they don’t even have on themselves,” said another fan. This implies that the public’s idea of what it wants in a legacy might be an alien concept to the personal ambitions of the athlete. Additionally, another hint from Davis pointed towards his mind being tired and considering stepping away from the sport, which makes this a very plausible exit opportunity in the form of a final mega-fight.
The debate quickly morphed into a historical comparison when a commenter said, “Man listen Ali would have told Frasier hold up let me get this 40 mill and I will get right back to you, any fighter saying he wouldn’t is lying.” This argument states that not only is this a decision that isn’t betraying the sport, but it is also a rational decision that just about any human being would make in its place when hypnotized by life-changing check.
In spite of purist objections, a large percentage of the masses will be tuning in for it. One user perfectly captured this paradox when they wrote, “Get your money. But this is a joke 🙄 boxing is WWE. All about the spectacle. And I still can’t help but watch 🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♂️ smh lol.” That is the guilty confession of “down to watch” which ensures that no matter how high the moral ground on which people will oppose it, the pay-per-view will be colossal.
Advertisement
The Gervonta Davis vs. Jake Paul fight is more than just about a fight-it’s an elaborate referendum on today’s boxing. It opens an uproar about what the sport truly values-more: real competition or marketable entertainment? While purists are mourning the death of tradition, pragmatists are recognizing that the new world view, where market viability frequently takes precedence over athletic viability, introduces new problems. Davis’s decision has now been marked as the representation of this era, with his legacy no longer inebriated solely by his victories but by the very character of the fights with which he chooses to be associated. The last bell won’t be tolled for this conversation anytime soon.