X/@ColinAllredTX
Democratic Congressman Colin Allred has severely criticized President Donald Trump arguing that he is more interested in the establishment of a private ballroom at the White House than in the federal employees who are losing their salaries because of the government shutdown. The California congressman’s criticism was made during a video in which he was offering coffee and donuts to the unpaid TSA employees at Dallas Love Field. Allred likened their sufferings to the $300 million renovation project that was made public.
Advertisement
Allred exclaimed in the video, ‘The president is constructing a ballroom while we are enduring a shutdown.’ He gave an account of his dialogue with the TSA workers who were already on their third week of no salary and remarked that most people working cannot bear such a financial gap. ‘They have to bear the expense of travelling to work while not receiving a salary,’ Allred said, presenting his good deed as a little consolation for the workers who have to bear the brunt of the political deadlock.
The Texas Congressman was surprised how the government was able to give priority to issues like the East Wing demolition, which he described as being carried out ‘without any procedures, without any consultations with the experts, just blasting away as if it were a rundown house that you bought and were trying to get rid of.’ He brought up the project in terms of both timing and symbolism and inquired, ‘Who would be toasting with champagne while the rest are struggling?’ Allred wanted it to be clear that not only the president but also the political class seemed to be ‘totally and absolutely out of touch with the reality faced by the majority of people.’
Allred’s tweet sparked a reaction on social media that was very much divided along party lines, with many users disputing his narrative and questioning his motives. One user asked, ‘Why are you bringing up etc. again? If you can’t see how the impact of President Trump’s policies on the American people is, then it’s not easy to understand what you mean by “doing for your constituents”‘ This comment indicates how deep-seated the polarization is when every political action is immediately interpreted in terms of the party line, and no one is ever recognized for making a genuinely meritorious act.
Another user reacted technically to critique regarding the ballroom, saying, ‘ZERO tax dollars are being allocated for the ballroom construction. ZERO! but SNAP is, the CR bill needs 60 votes in congress to pass and only 3 democrats voted to pass it.’ This statement highlights the complex financial arrangements behind the White House renovations while shifting the blame for the shutdown to the manner in which congress is voting.
Several commenters questioned the very foundation of Allred’s argument. ‘What a silly opinion,’ one user said. ‘Even if you win, you will have to put up with him for 2 years to get any meaningful law passed. Why don’t you just keep baiting the president and saying nothing about the reasons why you deserve my vote?’ This comment suggests that some of the audience believes the remarks are mere political theater rather than serious discussion of policy issues.
The ballroom project itself received mixed opinions, one supporter proclaiming, ‘A large room for diplomats/visiting dignitaries is a must. This ballroom is for everyone, the American people. President Trump can’t take it with him when he leaves, come on!’ This view sees the building change as a clever improvement in the facilities of the White House.
Donald Trump is more interested in turning the White House into his personal ballroom than serving the American people. It’s pathetic. pic.twitter.com/XyaWMq2j1f
— Colin Allred (@ColinAllredTX) October 29, 2025
Conversely, one more comment faulted Allred for his way of putting the message across: ‘It is clear that neither of you has been starving recently, and still, there you are, talking about the poor discussing people in a restaurant (of all places). This is a problem for Democrats, so don’t do it, and don’t confuse them with the ballroom issue.’ The comment on the setting highlights how political communication can lose its force if there are inconsistencies in the way the message is conveyed.
The conflict demonstrates that political debates often end up in fights about who is giving incorrect prominence to right issues and who is the one to blame for the situation. In Allred’s view, the presidential ballroom project is a symbol of disconnection, while critics regard his activities as street performances that do not address the issue. The shutdown is a case where every small action—whether bringing breakfast to workers or continuing with White House renovations—is heavily loaded and politically interpreted.
Advertisement
The struggle for perception and priorities is still ongoing even as federal workers labor without pay. The fundamental disagreement on how responsible leadership during a government shutdown should look is still very much alive along the party lines, with one party accusing the other of lack of concern for the common people who are suffering and having their priorities wrong. The ballroom issue has turned into yet another front in the ongoing conflict over the roles and responsibilities of government that brings to light the divisions that have made this conflict last. This situation reminds many of Rosie O’Donnell‘s frequent critiques of the administration. Meanwhile, activists like Sunsara Taylor continue to organize against the current leadership. The debate over reproductive rights also continues, with figures like Laverne Cox speaking out, and Allred himself has previously called for Roe v. Wade to become federal law.