Instagram/@lavernecox
Laverne Cox has shared a video analysis that is so detailed and insightful that it can be compared to a comprehensive study of the most controversial and divisive Britney Spear’s performance in music history. The actress did not conceal her appreciation for the video and left comments such as “I am addicted to this video.” ‘…the performance we were entitled to. Which was literally nothing.’ I have not seen the rest of the series but this study, I am in.”
Advertisement
The video does not treat the presenter with kid gloves. It reveals the bitter truths of that day in September 2007. Britney Spears was not only less than a year postpartum with her second child but also in the process of a public custody battle and fighting for the right to see her kids. Moreover, she was mourning the loss of family trust. All these factors combined should have resulted in her getting a break and the MTV together with the record label pushed for the “comeback” of Britney Spears in front of 7 million viewers. The analysis claims boldly and I quote “She should never have been on stage that night.”
It is interesting to see the video analyzing Spears’ supposed lack of energy at the performance as an intent. To the narrator’s mind, the song “Gimme More” had a dual meaning – on the superficial level about sex and on the deeper level about the “insane demands” from the media and some groups of her fan base. That night she gave what the requirement warranted: “absolutely nothing.” Cox’s support of this interpretation has contributed to the media’s scrutiny of women in general, especially those who are not in the lime light.
The replies from fans have been mainly in favor of and supportive of this interpretation. One of them identified with the resistance of Britney and put it in words, “I adore the part in her book where she tells about her not doing what they wanted her to do with her hair. Not flipping it around, keeping it still because she knew it would annoy them. And they did not deserve to see her sexy hair tricks! Team Britney forever.” Such an acknowledgment of Spears’ small rebellions suggests how much trouble she might have caused her management at a time when public perception was that she was completely out of control.
Another user shared a very personal and painful perspective, he wrote, “Since I heard baby one more time on the radio I have been a fan of Britney Spears and felt empathetic towards her all the time and didn’t know why. Then when I discovered that she was also an adult child of an alcoholic it clicked for me. She was the victim who fed the avarice of her parents and family. If they had really loved her they would have never forced her back on stage.” This remark draws attention to the often overlooked systemic family dynamics in the conversation surrounding Spears’ struggles.
The trauma of seeing the performance live is still very much alive in many, “The memory of seeing this live is forever marked in my memory,” one person commented. Another more directly said, “I was watching it, expecting a comeback and totally shocked by the vacant look in her eyes. She was obviously sick and nobody cared. What is worse, Sarah Silverman came out after and roasted her. No grace, no sympathy, and no compassion for someone who was obviously struggling. Britney deserved better.” These recollections point out that both Britney and her real fans were silent sufferers during the whole public spectacle that surrounded them.
Some even connected the past with the present, thus broadening the scope of the discussion to present-day issues. “Unfortunately, the situation is still the same and female artists are still judged on their looks, from Millie Bobby Brown to Madonna,” said one follower who saw a connection between the 2007 incident and the never-ending gender issue in the entertainment industry. Another international fan, wrote in Spanish, “Thanks to the media for ruining the last great pop superstar,” which could be interpreted as a translation of the sentiment that reflects global awareness of how media treatment damaged and eventually ended Spears’ career and well-being.
Despite the whole negativity surrounding her performance, there were still some voices of a positive nature. “My best performance! Totally Art!” shouted one fan. Another, less enthusiastically, commented, “There were no skips on this album and I didn’t mind the performance.” The opposing views on the early days of Britney’s performance indicate that some people were willing to accept the artist even in her raw and unrehearsed state.
The conversation also turned toward Spears’ recent memoir, as some readers admitted that her literary account completely altered their perception of that era. “If you read her autobiography, when she discusses this night I was crying. I will never forgive society for what they did to her,” one reader confessed. “I’m going to have to check out her memoir. This insight thoroughly makes sense. This album was definitely all and opened the door for other pop stars of this time who came after,” said another. It is clear that not only Cox’s critiques but also the contributions of Spears are slowly but surely restoring her reputation.
Advertisement
Laverne has injected new life into Britney’s performance by her endorsement of the viewpoint that was considered settled long ago. She is not only encouraging people to rethink how they consume and critique female artists, but also to reconsider the moment as a woman’s silent protest against the impossible expectations imposed on her. The overwhelming reaction indicates that people are ready to see the 2007 stage not as a failure but as a woman’s quiet resistance to impossible expectations. And almost two decades later, the message is finally getting through. Laverne Cox continues to use her platform to advocate for important causes, while her recent fiery defense of Tish James and fashion book showcase her diverse talents and commitments.